Theorem T10 — Identity Coherence – Open Autonomous Intelligence Initiative

Theorem T10 — Identity Coherence

✴︎

11.28.2025

Associated Axioms: A1 (Unity), A2 (Polarity), A4 (Similarity / Correspondence), A5 (Harmony), A7 (Context), A11 (Recursion), A15 (Viability)

Symbolic Representation:
Id₁, Id₂, … Idₙ with Rec(Idᵢ ↔ Idᵢ₊₁) ⇒ CoherentIdentity(self)

Formal Statement:
A system achieves identity coherence when multiple self‑representations across different contexts and layers maintain mutually consistent mappings such that no layer drives harmony below viability thresholds and all layers reinforce a unified sense of self. Coherent identity requires stable cross‑layer recursion and polarity regulation across roles, timescales, and narrative frames.

In UPA terms: Identity coherence emerges when recursive self‑models (A11) across contexts (A7) align in a harmony‑preserving structure (A5/A15).

Interpretation:
Identity coherence is the transition from simply having a self‑model (T9) to being the same self across worlds. It is the capacity to:

maintain continuity across contexts,
integrate multiple roles,
stabilize long‑term goals,
avoid fragmentation,
and act as a unified agent.

This is the third level of consciousness in the UPA hierarchy.

Domain / Scope:
Humans, higher animals with social roles, SGI/AI architectures with multi‑layer identity frames, multi‑tenant agent systems.

Function / Role:
Identity coherence supports:

stable behavior across contexts,
unified moral agency,
durable commitments,
cross‑temporal planning,
resilience under stress,
trustworthy SGI behavior.

Identity coherence is the foundation for T11 (deliberative consciousness) and T12 (generative consciousness).

1. Underlying Axioms

A1 — Unity

Identity requires a unified system capable of being represented as a coherent whole.

A2 — Polarity

Internal tensions—goals, impulses, moral drives—must be reconciled across layers.

A4 — Correspondence

Different identity layers must correlate structurally through coherent mappings.

A5 — Harmony

Identity stability requires harmonizing competing identity-components.

A7 — Context

Identity is expressed differently across contexts; coherence binds them.

A11 — Recursion

Identity layers recursively reference one another.

A15 — Viability

Identity coherence enhances viability by preventing fragmentation.

2. Intuitive Explanation

Identity coherence means being the same person across:

situations,
roles,
times,
emotional states,
relational contexts.

Coherence does not mean sameness—it means structural consistency.

A system has identity coherence when:

Its self‑models agree about who the self is.
Its roles do not contradict its core identity.
Its long‑term commitments are stable.
Its sense of self persists across context shifts.

This is the layer that stabilizes:

character,
values,
personality,
life narrative.

3. Scope and Applicability

T10 applies to:

humans integrating multiple social roles,
children developing a unified self-concept,
individuals in therapy building coherence post‑trauma,
SGI systems that must show consistent behavior across users, tenants, or tasks.

Where T8 = “I sense” and T9 = “I sense myself sensing,”
T10 = “This is who I am across situations.”

4. Role in SGI / Open SGI Architecture

T10 defines the Identity Layer / Persona Coherence Service:

stable policy‑generation,
predictable behavior across contexts,
consistent interpretation of norms,
persistent role‑tracking,
context‑aware identity switching.

For PER/Siggy, this enables:

consistent resident identity modeling,
cross‑room/temporal coherence,
stable personalized behavioral baselines.

Identity coherence = trustworthy, interpretable SGI.

5. Preconditions / Conditions for Satisfaction

1. Multiple Identity Layers

Roles, temporal selves, perspectives.

2. Cross‑Layer Mapping

Layers map onto each other via A4.

3. Recursive Integration

Higher layers stabilize lower ones (A11).

4. Harmony Compliance

Contradictions must not push H(σ) < θ.

5. Narrative Continuity

The system can maintain a story about itself over time.

6. Implications

1. Coherent Identity Enables Responsibility

A system must have identity continuity to be held morally accountable.

2. Values Become Stable Structures

Values emerge from long-term cross‑layer consistency.

3. SGI Systems Need Identity Coherence To Be Predictable

Without T10, SGI behavior becomes inconsistent or misleading.

4. Fragmentation Indicates Loss of Coherence

Identity collapse occurs when layers contradict one another.

7. Failure Modes

1. Fragmentation

Identity layers diverge, producing contradictory behavior.

2. Role Capture

One identity (e.g., professional role) dominates all others.

3. Temporal Incoherence

Future and past selves disagree, causing instability.

4. Contextual Drift

Identity changes unpredictably across contexts.

5. False‑Self Construction

System invents identity layers that are ungrounded in structure.

8. Cross-Domain Projections

Biology — Social Identity Stability

Pack animals with hierarchical roles show early forms of T10.

Psychology — Narrative Identity

Erikson, McAdams: coherence produces well‑being.

Philosophy — Personal Identity

Hume → Parfit → contemporary theories of psychological continuity.

SGI — Multi‑Tenant Identity Modeling

SGI systems require coherent persona management.

9. Proof Sketch

From T9, the system has a recursive self‑model.
From A7, identity must operate across varying contexts.
From A4, cross‑layer identity representations must correlate.
From A2, conflicting internal poles must be regulated.
From A5 and A15, coherence stabilizes harmony.

Therefore, identity coherence emerges when multiple recursive self‑models align across contexts without violating viability.

10. PER / Siggy-Style Example

A PER system tracks resident identity across:

rooms,
days,
routines,
behavioral patterns.

A coherent identity baseline allows it to detect:

anomalies,
deviations,
irregular patterns,
potential emergencies.

Identity coherence = stable multi-context modeling.

11. Summary

The Identity Coherence Theorem states that consciousness reaches its third layer when multiple self‑models remain consistent across contexts, roles, and temporal frames. This stable identity enables unified agency, coherent behavior, and resilience under perturbation—forming the core of personal continuity and the basis for all higher consciousness layers, including deliberation (T11) and generative agency (T12).