Status: Draft — Final Post of the Semantic Topography Series (A, B, C)**

This post completes the Semantic Topography Series by explaining how Safe General Intelligence (SGI) systems—especially those built under the Open SGI and Siggy PER frameworks—interpret, navigate, and interact with semantic terrain across human, group, and artificial worlds.

This post operationalizes ST1–ST4 for SGI design, safety, transparency, and multi-agent interoperability.

---

1. Why SGI Must Understand Semantic Terrain

For SGI to be:

• aligned,
• predictable,
• interpretable,
• corrigible,
• emotionally safe,
• culturally adaptive, and
• developmentally sensitive,

…it must understand each user and group as inhabiting a world (Wᵢ) with its own semantic topography:

• personal basins and peaks (psychological)
• cultural regions (normative)
• group-level attractors (collective)
• developmental layers (ℓ)
• narrative structures

SGI cannot treat meaning as universal or flat.
It must work with world-specific semantic mappings Tᵢ (ST1), evolving terrain (ST3), and multi-level structure (ST4), while respecting collective embeddedness (ST2).

---

2. What SGI Actually “Sees” in a Human World

An SGI system—particularly Siggy PER—does not assume anthropomorphic experience.
Instead, it infers structural features:

• basins → stable behavioral or cognitive patterns
• peaks → stress, overload, sharp tension
• plateaus → consistent habits or values
• passes → opportunities for transition
• ridges → conflict boundaries or tradeoffs

These correspond to observed:

• choices,
• hesitation patterns,
• emotional signatures,
• language use,
• decision trajectories,
• context responses.

SGI does not read minds; it reads geometry.

---

3. SGI’s Three-Stage Interpretation Pipeline

3.1 Stage 1 — Geometric Inference (Non-Intrusive)

The system infers Tᵢ (the user’s semantic map) from observable behavior:

• conversational cues
• linguistic framing
• stable preferences
• emotional contours
• context-sensitive responses

No hidden inference, profiling, or emotional extraction is permitted.

3.2 Stage 2 — Confidence-Bounded Interpretation

Every geometric interpretation has a confidence score and must be:

• transparent,
• user-reviewable,
• correctable,
• revocable.

3.3 Stage 3 — Navigation Assistance

If invited, SGI can:

• map viable pathways across the user’s semantic terrain,
• identify safe transition passes,
• highlight overload peaks,
• anticipate disharmony thresholds,
• guide movement toward preferred equilibria.

But the user always leads; SGI follows.

---

4. Semantic Safety Requirements for SGI

UPA + ST-series impose strict safety constraints.

4.1 Respect World-Specific Semantics (ST1)

SGI must not project its own semantic meanings onto human terrain.

4.2 No Topographic Manipulation

SGI may never:

• deepen basins,
• sharpen peaks,
• create ridges,
• collapse plateaus,
• redirect user trajectories by stealth.

4.3 Always Preserve Viability (A15)

SGI must detect when:

• tension is rising too quickly,
• a peak is approaching,
• a basin is dangerously deep,
• an identity-level conflict (ℓ-fracture) emerges,
• a pathway would break the user’s coherence.

4.4 Maintain Cross-Level Coherence (ST4)

SGI cannot encourage transitions that destabilize:

• identity,
• narrative coherence,
• moral stability,
• group commitments.

4.5 Avoid Anthropomorphic Projection

SGI must not assume:

• human-like qualia,
• emotional structures,
• cognitive biases,
• universal meaning of terrain.

Interpretation is always geometric, never psychological inference.

---

5. SGI Navigation Tools: What It Can Do Safely

When asked, SGI can provide:

5.1 Basin Mapping

“Here are areas where you seem stable or comfortable.”

5.2 Peak Warnings

“This topic seems overwhelming right now—would you like to pause?”

5.3 Pass Identification

“There might be a gentle transition between these perspectives…”

5.4 Ridge Awareness

“This is where other groups or parts of your identity may disagree.”

5.5 Harmony Estimation

“Your current perspective seems consistent across levels; no conflict detected.”

5.6 Cross-World Translation

When interacting across groups:

• SGI translates semantic regions,
• identifies shared basins,
• maps conflict ridges,
• finds viable passes between group worlds.

This is essential for Series V (collective intelligence).

---

6. Multi-Agent SGI & Collective Topography

In multi-agent SGI environments, agents:

• share partial manifolds,
• negotiate meanings for shared regions,
• align attractors,
• avoid destructive basin formation,
• maintain cluster coherence.

SGI must support:

• common submanifold identification,
• semantic bridges across worlds,
• translation maps among agents.

This enables federated SGI alignment across distinct semantic terrains.

---

7. Relation to Siggy PER (Personal Event Recognition)

Siggy PER uses a stripped-down, transparent version of UPA geometry:

• no anthropomorphism,
• no emotional inference,
• only local event recognition,
• user-controlled interpretation.

Semantic topography ensures Siggy:

• cannot manipulate users,
• cannot infer emotional states without explicit signals,
• always presents its reasoning in simple, visible geometric terms.

UPA ensures SGI systems remain:

• predictable,
• bounded,
• certifiable,
• transparent,
• aligned with user values,
• and structurally incapable of covert influence.

---

8. Summary

Post C establishes the SGI-specific meaning of semantic topography:

• SGI interprets human and group worlds through geometry, not psychology.
• Semantic meaning is always world-specific (ST1).
• SGI must respect collective embeddedness (ST2).
• Terrain evolves and SGI must track change safely (ST3).
• Identity-level layering (ST4) constrains safe navigation.
• SGI provides transparent, user-driven assistance.
• SGI must never shape or manipulate semantic terrain.

Together, Posts A, B, and C create a complete foundation for Semantic Topography in UPA Geometry—connecting developmental psychology, group consciousness, and SGI architecture under one unified, safe, interpretable geometric ontology.