Depends on: OAII Base Model — Common Types v0.1; OAII Base Model — World v0.1.1; OAII Base Model — Event v0.1.1; OAII Base Model — Knowledge v0.1
1. Purpose
The Policy object represents an explicit, inspectable, and enforceable set of constraints and decision rules governing how a system responds to Events and uses Knowledge within a World. Policies provide the primary mechanism for ethical transparency, accountability, and privacy enforcement in edge‑primary autonomous systems.
Policies are not hidden heuristics; they are first-class objects subject to review, revision, and audit.
2. Definition (Normative)
A Policy is an abstract governance object that:
- MUST be scoped to a specific World;
- MUST define permitted and prohibited actions or outputs;
- MUST reference the conditions under which it applies (e.g., Event types, Knowledge states, contextual axes);
- MUST be explicitly represented and referenceable;
- MUST support revision and versioning;
- MUST be enforceable by Devices/Agents that operate in the World.
A Policy is not an Agent, not a World, and not an implicit model behavior.
3. Scope and Non‑Scope
In Scope:
- Event-driven rules and constraints
- Notification and escalation constraints
- Privacy and data handling constraints
- Rate limits, quiet hours, and contextual gating
- Safety and graceful-degradation rules
Out of Scope:
- Legal conclusions or compliance certification
- Medical or clinical decision rules
- Global governance across unrelated Worlds
- Undocumented “policy by behavior” hidden inside models
4. Core Responsibilities
The Policy object:
- Constrains outputs and actions under defined conditions;
- Enforces privacy and retention rules for Signals, Events, and Knowledge;
- Defines escalation and notification pathways in aging‑in‑place contexts;
- Ensures accountability by making rules explicit and auditable;
- Supports revision without breaking continuity.
5. Required Attributes (Abstract)
A conforming Policy MUST expose the following attributes using shared types from Common Types v0.1.
5.1 Identity and Context
- policy_id : PolicyId
- world_ref : WorldId
5.2 Policy Classification
- policy_type : string
Examples: privacy, retention, notification, escalation, safety, gating.
5.3 Applicability
- applicability_conditions : ParameterSet
MUST reference at least one of:- event_type_id (World-scoped)
- contextual axes constraints (AxisType/value constraints)
- knowledge_type or knowledge_state
- device capability constraints
5.4 Effects (Normative)
- policy_effects : ParameterSet
MUST define one or more effects such as:- allow / deny / require-confirmation
- transform / redact / summarize
- notify / suppress
- escalate / de-escalate
- retain / delete / age-out
- throttle / rate-limit
5.5 State and Versioning
- policy_state : string (see Section 6)
- version_state : string
5.6 Privacy and Access
- privacy_class : PrivacyClass
- access_class : AccessClass
6. Policy States (Normative)
A Policy MUST support at least the following states:
- DRAFT: not yet active
- ACTIVE: in force
- SUSPENDED: temporarily inactive
- REVISED: updated; prior version retained for continuity
- DEPRECATED: retained for reference but not authoritative
- INVALIDATED: withdrawn due to error or conflict
Policy state transitions MUST be explicit and logged.
7. Policy Mechanism Bundle
Policy evaluation and enforcement MUST be represented using a mechanism bundle:
- policy_mechanism_id : MechanismId
- policy_mechanism_params : ParameterSet
- policy_mechanism_result : ResultSet (optional)
This bundle documents how the Policy is evaluated (e.g., rule engine id, decision table id) without mandating a specific implementation.
8. Relationships to Other Objects
- World scopes the meaning and applicability of Policies
- Events trigger policy evaluation
- Knowledge may be referenced as context (baselines, routines, prior summaries)
- Devices and Agents enforce Policies
- Signals may be retained, redacted, summarized, or discarded per Policy
- Logs record policy decisions, revisions, and enforcement outcomes
Policies MUST be enforceable at the edge without requiring cloud coordination.
9. Methods (Normative, Abstract)
To standardize behavior, a conforming Policy SHOULD support the following abstract methods:
9.1 evaluate_policy
Evaluates whether a set of conditions and inputs satisfy the Policy.
- method_params : ParameterSet (event reference(s), relevant knowledge refs, axis context)
- method_result : ResultSet (decision + obligations)
method_result SHOULD include:
- decision: ALLOW / DENY / REQUIRE_CONFIRMATION
- obligations: list of required effects (redactions, notifications, retention)
9.2 enforce_policy
Applies the Policy’s effects.
- method_params : ParameterSet (decision + target objects)
- method_result : ResultSet
9.3 revise_policy
Updates the Policy definition.
- method_params : ParameterSet (proposed changes)
- method_result : ResultSet
Requirements:
- MUST update version_state on success.
- MUST preserve continuity by retaining prior version metadata.
10. Edge‑Primary Constraints
In Edge‑primary systems, Policies:
- MUST be evaluable locally;
- SHOULD fail closed for privacy-protecting policies (deny by default);
- MAY be synchronized across devices with explicit versioning;
- MUST support degraded operation (e.g., reduced notifications rather than unsafe behavior).
11. Failure and Degradation Modes
Policy failure modes may include:
- conflicting policies
- missing context or knowledge references
- version mismatch across devices
Systems MUST surface policy conflicts and default to safer behavior per World-specific safety policies.
12. Notes for Implementers (Non‑Normative)
- Policies are the place to encode quiet hours, escalation tiers, consent controls, and retention limits.
- Policies should remain interpretable and auditable; avoid embedding complex behavior in opaque model weights.
- World-scoped policies permit local variation (different homes, different users) without breaking interoperability.
Status: Draft v0.1 (Normative Object Definition)

Leave a comment